HEWITTS
SRA-regulated firm
- Head office address
- BISHOP AUCKLAND + 3 other offices View contact details
- Website
- www.hewitts.co.uk
- Type of firm
- Recognised body since 01/11/2011, authorised for all legal services
- Regulator
- Solicitors Regulation Authority
- SRA number
- 51126
- Regulatory record
- Show regulatory record
We set the rules for this firm. There are benefits and protections for customers of SRA-regulated firms.
Important information
- The firm can provide all types of law, including reserved legal activities
- Everyone working in this firm must follow our rules
- If things go wrong, the firm must have insurance cover
- If things go wrong and your money is lost, our compensation fund may be able to reimburse you
- If things go wrong we may be able to get your documents and money back
Trading names lists the names this firm uses now. Previous names lists names this firm has used in the past.
These are the SRA-regulated people in this organisation.
-
Alicia Nesham
SRA-regulated solicitor
Works at HEWITTS
-
Alistair Gordon Nattrass
SRA-regulated solicitor
Works at HEWITTS
-
Bethany Louise Gannaway
SRA-regulated solicitor
Works at HEWITTS
-
Bethany Alice Scott
SRA-regulated solicitor
Works at HEWITTS
-
Brenda Davidson
SRA-regulated solicitor
Works at HEWITTS
-
Brogan Wilson
SRA-regulated solicitor
Works at HEWITTS
-
Callum Robert Terry
SRA-regulated solicitor
Works at HEWITTS
-
Danielle Sullivan
SRA-regulated solicitor
Works at HEWITTS
-
Helen Louise Simmons
SRA-regulated solicitor
Works at HEWITTS
-
Hollie Jaye Hammond
SRA-regulated solicitor
Works at HEWITTS
Areas of law shows the sort of work this firm does. Reserved activities lists the special legal jobs this firm can do because we regulate it as a law practice.
DECISION HISTORY
This section gives the disciplinary and regulatory decisions published under our decision publication policy.
Decision - Fined
Outcome: Fine
Outcome date: 9 August 2022
Published date: 24 August 2022
Firm details
No detail provided:
Outcome details
This outcome was reached by SRA decision.
Decision details
Hewitts Solicitors is a recognised body whose head office is at 207 Newgate Street, Bishop Auckland, DL14 7EL.
It was found that:
- Hewitts failed to have in place, contrary to Regulation 18(4) of the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (MLRs 2017) a documented and compliant firm-wide risk assessment between 26 June 2017 and 28 February 2022 and failed to have sufficient regard for the SRA’s warning notice on firm-wide risk assessments dated 7 May 2019 (updated on 25 November 2019). In doing so the firm:
- breached Principles 6, 7 and 8 of the SRA Principles 2011, and
- failed to achieve Outcome 7.5 of the SRA Code of Conduct 2011
and where the conduct took place after 25 November 2019 - breached Principle 2 of the SRA Principles, and
- breached Paragraph 2.1(a) of the SRA Code of Conduct for Firms
- From 26 June 2017 onwards, Hewitts, failed to have in place up to date anti-money laundering policies, controls and procedures (PCPs) to mitigate and effectively manage the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing, pursuant to Regulation 19(1)(a) of the MLRs 2017. In doing so the firm:
- breached Principles 6, 7 and 8 of the SRA Principles 2011, and
- failed to achieve Outcome 7.5 of the SRA Code of Conduct 2011
and where the conduct took place after 25 November 2019 - breached Principle 2 of the SRA Principles, and
- breached Paragraph 2.1 of the SRA Code of Conduct for Firms
- Hewitts failed to conduct any adequate source of funds checks for a client in a conveyancing transaction that completed on 16 March 2018. Hewitts also failed to conduct ongoing monitoring of the transaction as it progressed, to enable the firm to assess the risk of money laundering posed, pursuant to Regulation 28(11)(a) of the MLRs 2017. In doing so the firm:
- breached Principles 6, 7 and 8 of the SRA Principles 2011, and
- failed to achieve Outcomes 7.3 and 7.5 of the SRA Code of Conduct 2011
- From 10 October 2018 to 12 July 2022, Hewitts failed to nominate a money laundering reporting officer (MLRO), as required by Regulation 21(3) of the MLRs 2017. In doing so the firm:
- failed to achieve Outcome 7.5 of the SRA Code of Conduct 2011 and where the conduct took place after 25 November 2019
- breached Paragraph 2.1(a) of the SRA Code of Conduct for Firms
Hewitts was directed to pay a financial penalty of £1,300 and ordered to pay costs of £1,350.
SRA Principles 2011
Principle 6 - You must behave in a way that maintains the trust the public places in you and in the provision of legal services
Principle 7- You must comply with your legal and regulatory obligations and deal with your regulators and ombudsmen in an open, timely and co-operative manner
Principle 8 - You must run your business or carry out your role in the business effectively and in accordance with proper governance and sound financial and risk management principles
SRA Code of Conduct 2011
Outcome 7.3 - You identify, monitor and manage risks to compliance with all the Principles, rules and outcomes and other requirements of the Handbook, if applicable to you, and take steps to address issues identified;
Outcome 7.5 - You comply with legislation applicable to your business, including anti-money laundering and data protection legislation
SRA Principles 2019
Principle 2 - You act in a way that upholds public trust and confidence in the solicitors' profession and in legal services provided by authorised persons.
Code of Conduct for Firms (2019)
Paragraph 2.1(a) - You have effective governance structures, arrangements, systems and controls in place that ensure you comply with all the SRA's regulatory arrangements, as well as with other regulatory and legislative requirements, which apply to you