Samuel Thorne
SRA-regulated solicitor
- Authorisation
- Admitted on 01/09/2016. Annual practising certificate from 01/11/2024.
- Type of lawyer
- Solicitor
- Regulator
- Solicitors Regulation Authority
- SRA number
- 587379
- Regulatory record
- Show regulatory record
The services this person can provide and the protections for clients depend on where this person works.
DECISION HISTORY
These are the disciplinary and regulatory decisions published under our decision publication policy.
Decision - Sanction
Outcome: Rebuke
Outcome date: 8 December 2022
Published date: 26 January 2023
Firm details
Firm or organisation at time of matters giving rise to outcome
Name: Russell-Cooke LLP
Address(es): 8 Bedford Row, London, WC1R 4BX
Firm ID: 465322
Outcome details
This outcome was reached by SRA decision.
Decision details
Samuel Thorne is a solicitor.
In December 2017 Mr Thorne was working as an associate at Russell-Cooke LLP whose head office is at 8 Bedford Row, London WC1R 4BX, which is a recognised body.
It was found that on 7 December 2017 Mr Thorne made a lewd gesture to his colleague in front of other staff members at the firm’s Christmas party and this was captured on video footage. His actions breached:
- Principle 2 of the SRA Principles 2011 - act with integrity
- Principle 6 of the SRA Principles 2011 - behave in a way that maintains the trust the public places in you and in the provision of legal services.
- Principle 9 of the SRA Principles 2011 - run your business or carry out your role in the business in a way that encourages equality of opportunity and respect for diversity.
Mr Thorne was issued with a written rebuke and ordered to pay costs of £600.
This was because Mr Thorne’s conduct was serious by reference to the following factors in the SRA Enforcement Strategy: it demonstrated a lack of integrity on his part; he caused harm and distress to the recipient, failed to treat a fellow professional with respect and dignity and the gesture was sexual in nature.
Given that Mr Thorne acted with a lack of integrity, damaged the trust placed in the provision of legal services, had direct control and responsibility for his conduct and caused harm and distress, it was decided that a rebuke was an appropriate and proportionate sanction.